Spyros Lapatsioras,1 Leonidas Maroudas,2 Panayotis G. Michaelides,3 John Milios,4 D. P. Sotiropoulos,5 1. Introduction In the third chapter of Capital Marx observed: “As long as the social character of labour appears as the money existence of the commodity and hence […]
On the Character of the Current Economic Crisis
According to Shimshon Bichler and Jonathan Nitzan capital is not an economic quantity but a mode of power [29]; it could be sumarized as: “Capital is power quantified in monetary terms”. So, what do we do when we “quantify”? What
The Autocatalytic Sprawl of Pseudorational Mastery
The Marxist concept of value is very frequently equated, whether explicitly or merely tacitly, with the corresponding Ricardian concept of “labour expended”. This paper argues that unlike the Ricardian theory of value, the Marxist theory of value is a monetary
Marx’s Critique of (Ricardian) Political Economy, the Quantity Theory of Money and Credit Money
Contemporary capitalism is characterized on the one hand by ‘liberalization’ of markets, flexibility and restructuring of production structures in a direction undermining the workers’ rights and living standards, and on the other by a huge expansion of the financial sphere.
Marx’s Monetary Theory of Value and Capital and Contemporary Capitalism
Panayotis G. Michaelides, John G. Milios and Angelos Vouldi It is the purpose of the present paper to compare Emil Lederer and Joseph Schumpeter withrespect to their visions concerning the notions of economic growth, technology, credit and business cycles. Lederer,
Schumpeter and Lederer on Growth, Technology, Credit and Business Cycles