The highest formal act of the philosophical Decision through which philosophical faith in the real enables the latter to be posited as the Real in an illusory way. It is consequently the real cause of the appearance of philosophy. Auto-position […]
Auto-Position and Being-in-One (Being-According-to-the-One)
In order to determine the characteristics of non-philosophy, we frame it in opposition to an image of an established paradigm: Deconstruction (as suggested by Jean-Luc Nancy in La deconstruction du christianisme).1 We comment on this image, we add to it,
Deconstruction and Non-Philosophy
In the case of derivatives, it is always also a matter of a differentiality that is shifted and shifted in time, whereby one can paraphrase this with Derrida’s stratagem of “différance”, which he presented in his writing Marginalities of Philosophy.
Derivative and difference. On the stratagem of différance in Derrida
The formal structures of time collapse, regress to mud, andspace is pushed back and forth until it bends to be trampled by thepulsations of alien music, while the thinking space becomes seasick:this is the disruption as it can be experienced
Prophylaxis is on everyone’s mind these days. Oh what a reversal from only a few months ago, when the decades long march of promiscuous ontologies seemed unstoppable. Are freedom and mobility unquestionable virtues? Should everything touch everything else? Until recently the
A provocation: theories of the digital have generated very little digital theory. What do I mean? And why is this the case? First, one must separate the form of digital theory from the kinds of objects it wants to study. Thus a
“Blitze explodieren zwischen verschiedenen Intensitäten, aber ihnen geht ein unsichtbarer, nicht wahrnehmbarer, dunkler Vorbote voraus, der ihren Weg im Voraus determiniert, aber (wie eine Gravur) in umgekehrter Richtung. Ebenso enthält jedes System seinen dunklen Vorboten, der die Kommunikation der peripheren
Adorno speaks of the “non-identical being the own identity of the thing against its identifications” (Adorno, Negative Dialectic: 164). The cognition of the non-identical identifies differently from the identifying thinking, it emphasizes to say what something is, while the identifying
Adorno and Laruelle: The non-identical and the real
1) For Laruelle, philosophy always revolves around dualities or differences, being – other, theory – practice, ontic-ontological, etc. 2) Laruelle leaves this terrain to fully invest his thinking power in the solutions of the One’s problem, or more precisely to
What is determination in the last instance? (20 points)
This text includes a presentation of TETRALOGOS, the new (2019) book by François Laruelle, followed by an examination of his formula for a «general science fiction» and a proposal to make this formula more generic. Abstract(1) some general considerations regarding
FROM EARTH TO THE UNIVERSE – LARUELLE AND RADICAL SCIENCE FICTION
For a further explanation of the concept of capital we refer to the French philosopher François Laruelle, who in his conception of non-philosophy, when he speaks of “unilateral duality”, first generally assumes that two or more terms and their relations
