(This is the first of two excerpts from my talk at “Superpositions–A Symposium on Laruelle and the Humanities” hosted at the Center for Transformative Media at the New School. Read part two.) Newcomers to Laruelle often find his work challenging. […]
Dario Cankovic is an unhyphenated Marxist without adjectives, a doctoral student in philosophy at the University of Western Ontario working on the history of analytic philosophy (specifically the Marxist origins of and influences on the Vienna Circle), with a deep
Marxism as Anti-Philosophy: An Interview with Dario Cankovic
14 Thesen von Alexander Galloway gemäß Laruelle: 1) Das mediale Prinzip: Das Reale ist kommunizierbar, und das Kommunizierbare ist real. 2) Für das Standard-Modell der Philosophie ist alles, was gegeben ist, gespalten. 3) In der Non-Standard-Philosophie ist das Eine eine
Stichworte zu Alexander Galloways “Laruelle. Against The Digital”
Liveblogging reading Felix Guattari’s book LINES OF FLIGHT, translated by Andrew Goffey. The unconscious, for Guattari, is “structured” like a multiplicity of modes of semiotisation. This hypothesis contains in germ Bruno Latour ‘s multiple modes of existence, which are also
GUATTARI “LINES OF FLIGHT”: the hypothesis of modes of semiotisation (1 & 2)
In a lecture published in the Cardozo Law Review in 2008, Alain Badiou articulates his understanding of Being, Event, and Simulacrum in relationship to Logic and Law. With an incredible power of precision, Badiou reminds his audience of Aristotle’s three main
Badiou’s Jurisprudence: The Event of Law and The Law of The Event
A sequence of non-musicological praxis corresponding to phases of Non-musicology: Marked by a rebellious apprenticeship in experimental music, the first period of non-musicological praxis is not thoroughly non-musical. Throughout Musicology ?, terribly uncreative secondary works of experimental music were composed.
A sequence of non-musicological praxis corresponding to phases of Non-musicology:
[Slavoj Žižek: Organs without Bodies: On Deleuze and Consequences (New York: Routledge, 2003)] The following text can be read fast-forward or in slow-motion. The fast-forward version provides the main argument, the slow-motion version provides the argument plus more detailed commentaries.
“is it possible not to love žižek?” on slavoj žižek’s missed encounter with deleuze
François Laruelle’s explicit critique of Deleuze was published in French in 1995, in the same year as his THEORIE DES ETRANGERS, which is the book that Laruelle tells us inaugurates the third phase of his research, “Philosophy III”, where he
NOTES ON DELEUZE’S “LETTER TO A SEVERE CRITIC” (2): against Laruelle
As that non-philosopher François Laruelle recently said “It is necessary to welcome a certain return of gnosis against philosophy, institutional and academic conformism (amongst other things), but we have to ask ourselves, how do we finally make room for it
François Laruelle: Future Struggle, Gnosis, and the last-Humaneity
Now that the SR/OOO wave has crested, crashed, and receded, we can start to evaluate it with the advantage of perspective. I won’t attempt to offer an autopsy here, but I do want to address a few points and then
Assessing the Legacy of That Thing That Happened After Poststructuralism
1) ENTER THE MATRIX “You are entering a zone of “non-philosophy”… For you the philosopher it is a knowledge-collider, for you the physicist it is a conceptual maze – you are in the Matrix” (first sentence, PHILOSOPHIE NON-STANDARD, 7, my
QUANTUM COLLISIONS Comments on the first introduction to François Laruelle’s NON-STANDARD
Das Reale und das Eine Für François Laruelle ist die Philosophie definitiv das älteste Vorurteil. Natürlich haben die Philosophen etwas ganz anderes im Blick, wenn sie sich immer wieder die Frage »Was ist Philosophie?« stellen; oft genug wollen sie sich
Laruelle und die Non-Philosophie