This paper argues that the conception of ‘money endogeneity’ formulated and defended by Post-Keynesian economists can be founded on a coherent and theoretically sound way only on the basis of Marx’s theory of value, which the author comprehends as the […]
On the Question of Money Endogeneity: Marx vs. the Post-Keynesians
program: http://networkcultures.org/moneylab/events/moneylab-6/program/ abstracts: http://networkcultures.org/moneylab/events/moneylab-6/abstracts/ event page: http://networkcultures.org/moneylab/events/moneylab-6/ 7-8 March 2019, Siegen, Germany Locations Conference: Museum für Gegenwartskunst, Unteres Schloß 1, Siegen Workshops: Unteres Schloß, Unteres Schloß 3, building A, Siegen 7 March 2019 9.30 a.m. Doors open & registration. 10 a.m. – 12
MoneyLab #6 Infrastructures of Money
The rise of finance makes capitalist exploitation more effective but heav-ily reliant on market liquidity. When the latter evaporates, the whole setting quickly disintegrates. In other words, the demand for more discipline within capitalist power relations makes the economic milieu
Money in Marx: From value-form Analysis to an Understanding of Modern Capitalism
150 years after its publication, Marx’s Capital remains stunningly relevant today. In essence, it is a research program launched by Marx without ever having been completed, and which is basically an ongoing project, as its object is, as Marx himself
150 years Karl Marx’s “Capital”
Abstract: This article proposes the necessity to return to Suzanne de Brunhoff’s Marxist monetary theory in order to conceptualise the relationship between production and social reproduction within financialised capitalist social relations. De Brunhoff maintains a commitment to understanding «money as
Money as Money: Suzanne de Brunhoff’s Marxist Monetary Theory
Dirk Baecker schreibt in einem aktuellen Beitrag: »Auch das Kapital darf nicht im Singular, sondern muss im Plural gedacht werden.« Wenn er dann sofort zur Konkurrenz springt, verfolgt er zwar eine Spur, ohne Zusammenhänge darstellen und explizieren zu können. Die
Der marxistische Kapitalbegriff
INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE 14-15.1.2017 Olympia Hall – Garden of Zappio- Athens – Greece According to the above argumentation, the ‘products’ of financial innovation, even during the period just before the crisis when derivatives spiked, should not be considered as products of
150 years Karl Marx’s “Capital” Reflections for the 21st century
Wir führen die Diskussion um Spekulation, Zeit und Kapital entlang des Buches »Capital and Time« von Martijn Konings. Bis auf das Problem der Chrematistik bei Aristoteles geht die Kritik an der Spekulation zurück. Sie war von Anfang als eine Kritik
Spekulation, Kapital und Zeit (Konings: Capital and Time) (1)
The origins of the financial crisis of 2007–8 have been widely understood in terms of the financial system having transgressed the boundaries of its proper role and place in society; and the response has been driven above all by a
Contingency and Foundation: Rethinking Money, Debt, and Finance after the Crisis
(The following text is the slightly reworked version of an article which appeared on 21 September 2005 in “Jungle World”, a leftist German weekly newspaper. In a previous issue, Karl Heinz Roth, one of the main German representatives of Operaismo,
In getting to grips with “neoliberalism”, a recommended first port of call is the published transcripts of Michel Foucault’s 1979 lecture series at the Collège de France titled The Birth of Biopolitics.[i] In those lectures Foucault demonstrated that the foundations
Another Speculation? Michel Feher on Neoliberalism and Resistance
Viele der eingängigen Aussagen von kritischen Soziologen, angefangen bei Richard Sennett bis hin zu Elena Esposito, bewegen sich dahingehend, dass die Zukunft sich in einer gewissen Distanz zur Gegenwart befindet und gegenüber dem Hier und Jetzt geschützt und damit nicht
The Time of Money (Review) (2)